Is Morality Subjective or Objective? Essay -- Philosophy Philosophical

Is honourableity Subjective or Objective? Morality must be objectively derived because (1) the concepts of expert and morality exist (2) cultures differ regarding certain moral actions, thus there is the lead to discover which is right but cultures are similar regarding the existence of and need for morality (3) relativism is not logical and does not work, (4) for moral principles to be legitimate and consistent, they must be derived external to human societies. Otherwise morality is merely angiotensin-converting enzyme persons choice or feeling, not an understanding of truth and (5) the existence of religion. People recognize a moral aspect to the worship of god even if the deity does not exist, we still perceive a need for morality to be decreed by Someone or something greater than humanity. 1. First, the concepts of substanti exclusivelyy and morality exist. The real existence of the idea of good argues for something in human society that is different than the bunnies and t he wolves. Nature is amoral the bunnies do not protest the fact that wolves eat them. There is no notion, outside of Bambi, that the animals consider some of themselves good and some bad. Thus, the nature of humanity is somehow different than other creatures. Somehow we know that certain principles and actions are good and acceptable, rather than simply necessary for existence. We contemplate the abstract thought of moral principle itself, and the universality of such an idea. All human cultures do not put up exactly the same moral codes, but all cultures have a moral code. This concept of the nature of humanity argues for a code of morality that fits all people we seek it, we believe it, we feel that we need it. Second, cultures differ regarding certain moral actions but all cultures... ...s, 1998. Paton, H.J. The Moral Law Kants Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. London Hutchinson University Library, 1961. philosophic Psychology. Abstract of article in Volume 11, Number 4 , December, 1998. www.cs.indiana.edu/hyplan/cdelance Plato. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Bollingen Series LXXI. Edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press, 1961. Satris, Stephen. Taking Sides Clashing Views on Controversial Moral Issues. Guilford, CT Dushkin/McGraw-Hill, 2000. Schick, Theodore, Jr. Morality Requires God... or Does It? The Council for Secular Humanism. 17 July 2002. Article from Free Inquiry Magazine, vol.17, number 3. www.secularhumanism.org/library/fi/schick_17_3.html Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Cambridge Platonists. 17 July 2002. http//plato.stanford.edu